Skip to content
TestingExperience

AI Tool Tests

Independent tests of AI tools

27 guides on testing detectors, watermarks, provenance pipelines and disclosure labels.

Open section

Start here, in order

Methods and protocols

How we test 2.0%CI 1.3 to 3.1 False positive rate in the worked benchmark: 20 of 1,000 human-written documents wrongly flagged. Read the protocol
Editorial methodGlossaryReport an errorNo tool maker pays for a test

Software testing

Reference guides for testers

26 guides on planning, automating and designing tests, written to outlive any tool.

Testing Techniques

Sections

Recently updated

Test ManagementTest AutomationAgile TestingTesting TechniquesGuides name no products

Magazine

The magazine, 2008 to 2014

A free quarterly for professional software testers, published in Berlin across 28 issues.

The archive

Archive

Issue pages

28 issues Each issue page states the date and the theme where it is known, and nothing beyond it. The original issues are not distributed.
The archiveAll issuesEditorial methodRecords, not reproductions

Testing Experience Issue 28, December 2014

Issue 28, December 2014, was the last Testing Experience. Its theme was mobile testing, and it closed a run of 28 quarterly issues that began in March 2008.

Magazine archiveIssue 28 of 28Updated

In short

Issue 28, December 2014, was the final issue of Testing Experience. Its theme was mobile testing, and it closed a run of 28 quarterly issues that began in March 2008 with test management. The mobile app testing guide is the current treatment of the theme, from the device matrix to store submission checks.

Issue
28 of 28
Published
December 2014
Theme
Mobile testing; final issue
Format
Quarterly, English, free after registration
Available here
No, the original issues are not distributed

Browse all 28 issues

Every issue with its date and theme, and the twelve that have their own page.

Open the issue index

The final issue

The issue. Issue 28, published in December 2014, was the final issue of Testing Experience. The magazine had appeared every quarter since March 2008 as a free PDF in English for professional testers, published by a Berlin testing consultancy and training company and edited by Jose Diaz. Its theme was mobile testing, which made a fitting close: the magazine had opened in 2008 with a launch issue on test management and ended on the platform that had changed day-to-day testing more than any other in the seven years between.

What it covered. Mobile testing is the known theme of the issue; its individual articles are not described here. Over its 28 issues the magazine had covered test management, security testing (with a sister title, Security Acts, growing out of the June 2009 security issue), agile testing, open source testing tools and much else, and the mobile theme drew several of those threads together. Device coverage is a test management problem, mobile app security is a security testing problem, and short app release cycles pushed teams toward agile delivery whether they had planned for it or not.

The end of the run. Testing Experience ended with this issue in December 2014, and this site is an independent knowledge base, started in 2026, that continues the magazine's subjects; it is not the original publisher. The magazine hub describes the publication as a whole, and the issue index lists all 28 issues with their dates and known themes.

The magazine opened in 2008 on test management and closed in 2014 on the platform that had changed day-to-day testing most.
Archive method

Mobile testing, 2014 to 2026

Mobile testing in 2014. In December 2014 the device matrix was still built by extension from desktop practice: a few phones and tablets across the two dominant operating systems, chosen largely by what the team happened to own, with emulators considered adequate for most cases. Interruptions such as calls and notifications, poor networks and permission prompts were known risks, but they were often tested by hand at the end of a cycle. App store review was something to get through rather than something to plan for, and there was no shared standard for what a secure mobile app had to demonstrate. Test automation for native apps existed, but most teams treated it as an experiment rather than the backbone of a release.

How it changed by 2026. By 2026 the matrix is built from the app's own analytics, the OS version dimension has to cover several years of releases on one platform, foldables and tablets are separate form factors, and device clouds make real-device runs cheap enough to be the default, which is the argument of the mobile guide's closing section on emulators, real devices and device clouds. On security, nothing equivalent to OWASP's Mobile Application Security Verification Standard existed in 2014; its first version appeared in 2018, the companion testing guide followed the same year, and MASVS 2.0 in 2023 is now what an app store review or a client contract cites.

Where to read about it now

Where to read about it now. The mobile app testing guide is the current treatment of the issue's theme. Figure 1 is a device matrix of form factors against OS versions, with primary configurations that run in full every release and sampled cells that rotate; Table 1 gives the dimensions of that matrix with the options in each and a rule for choosing, and the text sets the target at 8 to 12 primary and 6 to 10 sampled configurations for a typical consumer app. The interruption list (seven cases), the network conditions section, the store submission checks and a 25-item checklist cover the rest. The performance testing guide covers the test types and reporting that apply to the services behind an app, and the recommended reading page lists the standards, books and communities that have taken the trade magazine's place.

Then and now

Table 1 | Then and now: mobile testing, 2014 and 2026
Area20142026
Device matrixA few phones and tablets, chosen largely by what the team ownedBuilt from the app's own analytics
Form factorsPhones and tablets across the two dominant operating systemsFoldables and tablets treated as separate form factors
Real devicesEmulators considered adequate for most casesDevice clouds make real-device runs cheap enough to be the default
Security standardNo shared standard for what a secure mobile app had to demonstrateMASVS 2.0, from 2023, cited by app store reviews and client contracts

Guides that continue this subject

Questions

Was issue 28 the last Testing Experience?

Yes. Issue 28, December 2014, was the final issue. The magazine had published 28 quarterly issues since March 2008.

What did the final issue cover?

Its theme was mobile testing. This page does not describe the individual articles; the mobile app testing guide on this site is a current, independent treatment of the subject.

Can I read the December 2014 issue here?

No. This site does not distribute the original issues. It is an independent knowledge base, started in 2026, that continues the magazine's subjects.

Where do I read about mobile testing now?

The mobile app testing guide in the Testing Techniques hub covers device matrix design, interruptions, network conditions, store submission checks and a 25-item checklist.

Who made Testing Experience?

A Berlin testing consultancy and training company published it, and Jose Diaz edited it, from the March 2008 launch issue to this final issue in December 2014.

Sources

  1. The original testingexperience.com homepage, Internet Archive capture of February 2015
  2. OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG)
  3. OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

Back to top